The Social Security Administration (SSA) has worked hard to ensure that their beneficiaries receive the best possible care, but their efforts may soon be thwarted by Congress, as House Republicans refused to increase necessary funding for the SSA in the continuing resolution passed in September.
This refusal forced the agency to impose a hiring freeze last month, resulting in the worst staffing crisis in 50 years and a record number of beneficiaries to serve. This will result in longer wait times on the phone or online when attempting to resolve issues, potentially leading to a slew of problems down the road.
The SSA issued a statement regarding the issue. “The SSA will lose over 2,000 additional employees, including experienced staff, through attrition in the next three months if it does not receive an increase in funding by March.” Customer service will suffer as wait times in our field offices and on the 800 number rise, backlogs grow, and customers face additional delays in getting their claims processed.”
Under the leadership of former Commissioner Martin O’Malley, the administration made a valiant effort to work with the existing budget, but further cuts would make the situation unsustainable.
An SSA spokesperson stated that the Social Security Administration had to implement a hiring freeze on November 21 due to the existing Continuing Resolution, which did not include the Administration’s requested anomaly. If we continue to receive flat funding, we will lose many of our recent gains.
And the SSA is not the only agency suffering from these cuts; the IRS and the Federal Aviation Administration, both key players, have begun their countdown to hiring freezes due to a lack of allocated funds.
The impact of the lack of funding on Social Security
Agency employees will likely face up to ten days of furlough, offices will close, and service levels will plummet if the funding crisis remains unresolved. The spokeswoman continued: “This means our field offices, card centers, and the national 800 number would have reduced levels of service and further delayed critical services that the public depends on.”
However, it is not only SSA employees that are concerned. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, also issued a warning about the program’s lack of funding and its impact on beneficiaries. “The Senate Appropriations bill increased funding.
However, the House Appropriations bill significantly reduced the funding. Furloughing employees would be disastrous. We should not reduce the Social Security budget. It just makes it more difficult for Americans to receive their benefits. It implies a significant decline in customer service.” I don’t understand why anyone would support that.”
The lack of funding, which would be $401 million below its fiscal 2024 operating level and $1.6 billion below President Biden’s request for increased funding, would cripple services, but Republicans appear unconcerned.
They contend that Biden’s request is “unsustainable and could lead to significant reductions in other non-defense discretionary areas.” One Republican senator blamed the problem on the agency’s employees working from home, refusing to hear any other explanation.
He is not alone; many House Republicans point out that only 39% of SSA officials in Washington work at least three days per week.
“They have the resources and should responsibly use the increase we’ve already given,” a Republican adviser said, but it might not be that easy.
The Trump transition team and congressional Republicans are advancing plans for a new “Department of Government Efficiency” led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.
The initiative aims to streamline federal operations, with Musk proposing $2 trillion in budget cuts. The two had initial meetings with Republicans on Capitol Hill to discuss their vision.
Read Also :- SSI: the Federal payment of $967 for seniors and people with a disability if you are short of money
